Rapid Consolidation of U.S. Fishing Industry Prompts MA Suits and Report



Food & Water Watch launched a campaign Thursday, June 16, calling on Congress to stop the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) from further expanding a widely unpopular fisheries management program known as catch shares — a program that has resulted in job loss for thousands of fishermen across the United States. The national consumer advocacy group also released a report (Fish, Inc.) revealing that the number of catch share programs, which grant once-public access to fish to private interests, have increased by 150 percent (from 6 to 15) in the United States in less than a decade, while NOAA plans to expand the programs by an additional 33 percent in the next 5 years.

“Fish are a public resource. Unfortunately, private investment groups and even some public interest groups have shamelessly and publicly compared access to fish to the stock market and are treating it like an investment that can be bought and sold for personal profit,” said Wenonah Hauter, Food & Water Watch Executive Director. “They’re aiming to model the fishing business after big agribusiness on land, with giant commercial operations controlling the market.”

A means to essentially privatize fishing, catch shares divide up the fish in any given region and grant access to certain companies and individuals — giving fishing privileges to fewer, often larger corporate interests while pushing out smaller-scale, more traditional fishermen.
As a result, catch shares consolidate the fishing industry. According to the report, in 2010, about five months after a catch shares program began in New England, 55 of the initial 500 boats in the fishery controlled 61 percent of the revenue.

The amount of fish given to a fisherman through a catch share program, also known as quota, is often leased out for profit rather than fished by the quota owner. Last year in New England, for example, 253 of the 500 boats remained docked, unable to fish because they were not granted enough quota and could not afford to purchase more.

The New England catch share program prompted the cities of Gloucester and New Bedford, Mass., along with local fishermen and advocates, to file a suit challenging its legality. Additional lawsuits are ongoing in the Gulf of Mexico and, most recently, the Pacific Coast.

Numerous New England fishermen and their supporters attended Food & Water Watch’s campaign kickoff on Thursday in New Bedford.

“Food & Water Watch is a great ally of the fishing families in New Bedford and other port communities,” New Bedford Mayor Scott W. Lang said. “They understand the fishery management issues and have arrived at their positions on catch shares using an objective analysis. New Bedford appreciates Food & Water Watch’s efforts to educate the American public on this important issue.”

“The massive loss of jobs within the fishing industry is directly correlated to the catch share program,” said Tina Jackson, President of the American Alliance for Fishermen and their Communities and a commercial fisherman and lobsterman herself. “It is vitally necessary for Congress to put forth legislation to halt any further programs of this nature and save the hundreds of thousands of jobs in the U.S. that will be lost if NOAA’s national catch share policy is allowed to be implemented.”