A Case for Salmon Feedlots on Land

Inka Milewski - Commentary

(Reprinted from the St. John’s Telegraph-Journal. First published Monday May 30, 2011)

In a commentary in the Telegraph - Journal (May 26), a spokesperson for the Atlantic Canada Fish Farmers Association asked the question: “Why would we want to grow salmon in an unnatural closed system when we can grow them in a natural environment, uncrowded and using minimal energy?”

The answer is simple. Since there is nothing natural about fish being trapped in netpens, fed food pellets laced with chemicals or being bathed in pesticides, it's time to move these operations out of public waters and stop the salmon industry's ecological and economic free-ride.

Open netpen salmon farms operate like industrial feedlots in our coastal waters. They generate large quantities of wastes and the cost of waste disposal is paid by the environment and not the industry. Recent scientific studies indicate that waste from salmon farms is not diluted and can have negative bay-wide ecological impacts. In addition, the wide-range of drugs and pesticides needed to grow salmon in feedlot conditions are known to have impacts on species beyond the netpens.

The physical and environmental footprint of salmon grown in open netpens can destroy, displace and disrupt habitat for other species like lobster and migratory fish. While the industry may claim that the area of the ocean they occupy is small, Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) habitat regulators believe any alteration, disruption or destruction of just 100 square metres of seabottom is enough to trigger regulatory action.

Year-to-year, environmental monitoring results from fish farms in New Brunswick show that at least 20 percent of salmon feedlots are routinely required by the provincial government to undertake some kind of remediation because the sea bottom under their netpens has become so toxic that 60 to 70 per cent of biological diversity has been lost.

Surprisingly and disappointingly, DFO only steps in with enforcement action when 70 to 90 per cent is lost.

The salmon industry need not be baffled as to why they are being asked to move their operations onto land. They have created unnatural feedlots in the oceans. Our coastal waters are not limitless in their capacity to absorb all of the waste salmon feedlots produce nor is there limitless habitat for commercial and non-commercial species, many of which have specific habitat needs.

If federal regulators are serious about their mandate to protect ocean habitat and the species that inhabit it, DFO needs to immediately begin developing plans to transition salmon feedlots from the sea to land where the industry will finally have to pay for the real cost of farming salmon.

CONTENTS

Alewives Attract Gulls And Gawkers

Eastern Puma — The Mystery Continues

Editorial

Reviving Alewife Runs

Eagle Whisperer

Helping Fishermen...Helping Communities

Days Out Set for 2011 Atlantic Herring Season

Op/Ed

Feds Announce National Aquaculture Policy: Paves Way For Factory Fish Farming Industry In U.S. Waters

2011 Maine Lobster Boat Racing Schedule

Mazzetta Buys Atwood Lobster

Rapid Consolidation of U.S. Fishing Industry Prompts MA Suits and Report

Transportation of Lobsters to California-1874

A Case for Salmon Feedlots on Land

Race Buzz 2011

Launchings

Back Then

Asphalt to Asparagus

July 2011 Meetings

Chester Pike

Down East Thicker Fog

Classified Advertisement

Mexican Million

Capt. Mark East’s Advice Column

Lecture-Book Review at the Sail, Power and Steam Museum